| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
For BE architectures there is one significant difference
in comparison with time64 support for little-endian
architectures like ARMv7.
The difference is that we strictly need to pass two 64bit
values to system calls because Linux Kernel internally uses
`struct __kernel_timespec` and similar, which consists of two
64bit fields.
For this reason many files have been changed to convert
pointers to timespec-family structures (mixed of 64bit and 32bit values)
to the pointer of the similar but 64bit-only structures
for using as system calls args.
This is general prerequisite for any BE architecture.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Chestnykh <dm.chestnykh@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch introduces *time64 syscalls support for uClibc-ng.
Currently the redirection of syscalls to their *time64
analogs is fully supported for 32bit ARM (ARMv5, ARMv6, ARMv7).
The main changes that take effect when time64 feature is enabled are:
- sizeof(time_t) is 8.
- There is a possibility os setting date beyond year 2038.
- some syscalls are redirected:
clock_adjtime -> clock_adjtime64
clock_getres -> clock_getres_time64
clock_gettime -> clock_gettime64
clock_nanosleep -> clock_nanosleep_time64
clock_settime -> clock_settime64
futex -> futex_time64
mq_timedreceive -> mq_timedreceive_time64
mq_timedsend -> mq_timedsend_time64
ppoll -> ppoll_time64
pselect6 -> pselect6_time64
recvmmsg -> recvmmsg_time64
rt_sigtimedwait -> rt_sigtimedwait_time64
sched_rr_get_interval -> sched_rr_get_interval_time64
semtimedop -> semtimedop_time64
timer_gettime -> timer_gettime64
timer_settime -> timer_settime64
timerfd_gettime -> timerfd_gettime64
timerfd_settime -> timerfd_settime64
utimensat -> utimensat_time64.
- settimeofday uses clock_settime (like in glibc/musl).
- gettimeofday uses clock_gettime (like in glibc/musl).
- nanosleep uses clock_nanosleep (like in glibc/musl).
- There are some fixes in data structures used by libc and kernel
for correct data handling both with and without enabled time64 support.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Chestnykh <dm.chestnykh@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
I then reworked the syscall handling and made minor cleanups. With luck
I've not completely broken his patch...
|
