Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The clone based version was introduced by commit
58570fc8e1fd601f15be5758ab95013d56771804
vfork: Use clone if arch does not have the vfork syscall
but the code was made unreachable by the previous commit
0a043c30ee71245dfe7c9d82d654312c5e1f6127
vfork: make all archs consistent
that adds a guard which require either __NR_vfork or __NR_fork
to be set.
Neither will be set on an arch that would need to use the
clone based version.
The double declaration of vfork was also introduced by
the merge of the two above mentioned patches.
The missing ; was present in the original patch.
CC: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
CC: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
CC: Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
|
|
__vfork is hidden.
__GI_vfork is strong (not weak as it was).
vfork is weak.
e1 can use the generic version.
Note: libc_hidden_def(x) has different meaning in .c and .S files.
Signed-off-by: Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
|
|
Rather than force people to always implement their own vfork(), have the
default implementation be sane.
For now, only the Blackfin port uses the new code.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
|
Appears to build fine (several .configs tried)
|
|
|
|
the archs fail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
missing headers, other jump relocs removed
|
|
|
|
implementation of vfork is present.
|