Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
in libc.so
|
|
|
|
to _dl_setup_stack_chk_guard, as in glibc. SSP requires now binutils-2.16.1 and newer. Add NOT_IN_libc/IS_IN_libc. Began using -DSHARED in uClibc_main.c, there are more candidates in there. Move back dl_protect_relro to it's earlier place.
|
|
possible. Add clean targets for linuxthreads[_db].
|
|
archs lack proper crt1. The Makefiles in extra/scripts are intended to be linked into each dir, where it is necessary to build locally.
|
|
|
|
lib*.a, also handle arch specific optimized versions
|
|
|
|
places to get an object built for lib*.so but not for lib*.a.
|
|
objects at once; use :=//$</$^; use CRT_SRC/CRT_OBJ/SCRT_OBJ/CSRC/COBJ/SSRC/SOBJ/MSRC/MOBJ where no more is needed, if only CSRC is present use OBJS directly instead of COBJ; CTOR_TARGETS are created directly in lib; remove unused/unneeded parts. Hope I haven't broken too much.
|
|
defer only for shared lib related stuff, because it is optional. Run STRIPTOOL only once. More use of /$^/$<.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
only once. Generalize all toplevel makefiles. Make sure, that libdl.so is built against libc.so and not libc.a
|
|
|
|
I use an implementation for malloc()/free() which is sensible about
using data after freed. In libdl.c, rpnt1->next->next is accessed after
rpnt1->next is freed. Attached patch fixes that problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove __attribute__ ((__weak__)) from imported ld-uClibc.so.0 symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitsize
|
|
|
|
sizeof pointers
|
|
|
|
more readable
|
|
|
|
RPATH sematics changed to match RUNPATH. Only difference is
that RPATH is searched before LD_LIBRARY_PATH and RUNPATH
after. This is not complete but better than the current mess(I think).
|
|
something else
broke. I hate libdl :(
|
|
|
|
possibly break other apps. Please test. Send a LD_DEBUG=1 log if
there is a problem.
|
|
where possible. This will also make ldso smaller.
However the patch touches all archs and I have only tested PPC and x86.
|
|
|
|
parallel build works correctly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-fstack-protector and -fno-stack-protector-all security
options
|
|
Here's an updated version of the patch I posted about a month ago. It
leaves -nostdinc alone, and uses -print-file-name=include instead of
-print-search-dirs to figure out where GCC's internal headers are.
Please let me know whether there are any portions of this patch you'd
like me to break into smaller pieces, to rework, or to give up trying
to get into uClibc :-) Thanks,
|
|
Mips did not honour the LD_BIND_NOW env. variable or the DT_BIND_NOW flag
in the dynamic section.
|
|
Andrew de Quincey, who has been most helpful getting this sorted
out, thanks. Thanks also to Peter Mazinger who did alot of testing.
Removed all traces of dl_parse_copy_information() since it is no longer used.
|
|
- Replace all open coded dynamic handling with a function. Reduces size.
- Fold special MIPS dynamic code into the dynamic_info item.
- Add RELRO support.
- Support linking with "-z now".
- prepare for DT_RELACOUNT/DT_RELCOUNT optimization.
- Add -z now to ld.so linking, this is what ld.so does anyway so
let the linker know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mazinger implements the changes suggested by me on the uclibc list.
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 02:24 pm, Erik Andersen wrote:
> What I think should be done is
>
> *) Someone that cares about USE_CACHE should fix that option
> up to be sure it works, and give it a proper config entry
> in extra/Configs/Config.in, and rename it to something
> more appropriate such as LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT.
>
> *) When LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT=n, UCLIBC_RUNTIME_PREFIX /usr/X11R6/lib
> should be included in the default library search path in
> dl-elf.c, ldd, and ldconfig.
>
> *) When LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT=y, UCLIBC_RUNTIME_PREFIX /usr/X11R6/lib
> should be excluded from the default library search path in
> dl-elf.c, ldd, and ldconfig, and those wishing to include
> X11 stuff should add that into /etc/ld.so.conf and re-run
> ldconfig.
>
> *) At present, LDSO_CONF and LDSO_CACHE use the same names
> and same structure as glibc. This precludes
> LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT being uses in any sane fashion on a
> dial glibc and uClibc system. Just as it was necessary
> for use to use a different name for 'libuClibc' rather
> than 'libc', and 'ld-uClibc.so.0' rather than
> 'ld-linux.so.2' it seems that these configuration files
> really ought to be given different names.
>
|
|
This needs testing with apps that have complex dependencies.
|
|
|