blob: b04e524d7a29b9b6c835d3d3bbc2a336af53256f (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
--- transproxy-1.6.orig/tproxyrun 2004-03-31 14:19:34.000000000 +0200
+++ transproxy-1.6/tproxyrun 2012-10-24 09:06:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Linux)
# I really have no idea about Linux, are these kernel versions correct
# for the type if network filtering supported? Is there a surefire way?
case `uname -r` in
- 2.[3456789].*)
+ 3.*|2.[3456789].*)
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d localhost --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d "$HOSTNAME1" --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
if [ -n "$HOSTNAME2" ]; then
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ if [ -n "$FORCE_URL" ]; then
fi
# Start transproxy running.
-/usr/local/sbin/tproxy -s "$TRANSPROXYPORT" -d $CMD "$PROXYNAME" "$PROXYPORT"
+/usr/sbin/tproxy -s "$TRANSPROXYPORT" -d $CMD "$PROXYNAME" "$PROXYPORT"
# Remove the filter rules.
case `uname` in
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ FreeBSD)
;;
Linux)
case `uname -r` in
- 2.[3456789].*)
+ 3.*|2.[3456789].*)
iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -p tcp -d localhost --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -p tcp -d "$HOSTNAME1" --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
if [ -n "$HOSTNAME2" ]; then
|
