From 343c9c0f915dc7dce19c9b30f2197d61389ef4f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Peter S. Mazinger" Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:17:57 +0200 Subject: limits.h: update Should we care about compilers not defining __LONG_LONG_MAX__? Signed-off-by: Peter S. Mazinger Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer --- include/limits.h | 23 ++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/limits.h') diff --git a/include/limits.h b/include/limits.h index 45cd6f253..3e9a5df88 100644 --- a/include/limits.h +++ b/include/limits.h @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ -/* Copyright (C) 1991, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +/* Copyright (C) 1991, 1992, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2005 + Free Software Foundation, Inc. This file is part of the GNU C Library. The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or @@ -122,20 +123,20 @@ #if defined __GNUC__ && !defined _GCC_LIMITS_H_ /* `_GCC_LIMITS_H_' is what GCC's file defines. */ # include_next +#endif /* The files in some gcc versions don't define LLONG_MIN, LLONG_MAX, and ULLONG_MAX. Instead only the values gcc defined for ages are available. */ -# ifdef __USE_ISOC99 -# ifndef LLONG_MIN -# define LLONG_MIN LONG_LONG_MIN -# endif -# ifndef LLONG_MAX -# define LLONG_MAX LONG_LONG_MAX -# endif -# ifndef ULLONG_MAX -# define ULLONG_MAX ULONG_LONG_MAX -# endif +#if defined __USE_ISOC99 && defined __GNUC__ +# ifndef LLONG_MIN +# define LLONG_MIN (-LLONG_MAX-1) +# endif +# ifndef LLONG_MAX +# define LLONG_MAX __LONG_LONG_MAX__ +# endif +# ifndef ULLONG_MAX +# define ULLONG_MAX (LLONG_MAX * 2ULL + 1) # endif #endif -- cgit v1.2.3