From 69c54f803864cee503801f7e45b6c22e28db2df1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Landley Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:34:52 +0000 Subject: Be consistent about spelling. LGPL says "License" not "Licence", so go with that. (Spotted by Xride on irc.) --- docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html b/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html index 631944fd9..8cc1be20e 100644 --- a/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html +++ b/docs/uclibc.org/FAQ.html @@ -173,9 +173,9 @@ How could it be smaller and not suck? No, you do not need to give away your application source code just because you use uClibc and/or run on Linux. uClibc is licensed under the Lesser GPL licence, just - like the GNU C library (glibc). Please read this licence, or have a lawyer - read this licence if you have any questions. Here is my brief summary... + href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.html">Lesser GPL license, just + like the GNU C library (glibc). Please read this license, or have a lawyer + read this license if you have any questions. Here is my brief summary... Using shared libraries makes complying with the license easy. You can distribute a closed source application which is linked with an unmodified uClibc shared library. In this case, you do not need to give away any -- cgit v1.2.3